|
Brought to you by Birth International |
Defensive midwiferyThe workshop over the weekend in Leamington Spa (south of Birmingham) offered some interesting insights into the ways that midwives are often forced to work. The group was a mix of older, experienced midwives and younger graduates, and it was clear that the hospitals they represented were quite medicalised in their approach. In such an environment, one strategy that is often used to stop midwives from deviating from accepted norms is to quote “policy” as the reason for certain tasks or interventions being done. A case in point was the discussion that arose around the management of the second stage of labour. One midwife stated that at the home births she facilitated, she didn’t feel constrained by any time limits on the pace of second stage, but in the hospital she felt obliged to adhere to the policy of “if, after 20 minutes for a multip or 40 minutes for a primip there is no progress, some form of hurry-up intervention (which I gathered usually meant urging the woman to “push, and push hard”) must be started.. As soon as she had finished this description, a colleague jumped in and said that she was wrong with this policy, as it was 30 minutes without progress for multips, not 20 as she had stated. At this point, a more senior midwife joined the discussion and stated clearly that there was no policy of time limits for second stage. This was news to many in the group, and it seemed to me that this was a good example of how non-existent “policy” is often quoted to coerce midwives into conforming to someone else’s timetable or practise preferences. It is another example of horizontal violence that so bedevils midwifery. It is also a good reason why midwives need to learn how to ask the appropriate question, “could you please show me this policy?” before blindly accepting such statements at face value. Newly qualified midwives are easily cowed by dictatorial behaviour from colleagues and this leads to fear setting in and the potential for defensive midwifery to develop. I worry when midwives say they cannot question a policy because they fear for their jobs if they create waves - if they can’t stand up to bullying colleagues how can they ever act as advocates for women who are even more disadvantaged in the often hierarchical, officious and bureaucratic system called health care? Of course, when I put these challenges to some midwives, they find it easier to blame me as the messenger (after all, as I am not a midwife, I could hardly know what goes on, could I?), rather than accept that their system (or themselves) need to address these problems. I can take these criticisms, and agree that sometimes I am provocative and maybe seem harsh in my comments about their practise. However I won’t accept that these conditions can’t be changed. Those who are part of these systems are in the best position to stir the pot and demand better things for themselves and the women they care for. Where there is a will, there is a way..... Posted by andrea at October 12, 2004 05:27 AM Hi Andrea, Posted by: andrea albertini on October 19, 2004 04:13 PM Hi Andrea, Posted by: Jan phipps on October 24, 2004 01:54 AM Post a comment |