|
Brought to you by Birth International |
Setting parents up for coercion during labourBack to work today after the Easter break. Over the weekend I had a chance to catch up with one of my pregnant neighbours (there are 4 couples expecting babies soon in my small block of apartments) and I was able to answer the questions she had regarding her birth plan. She and her husband had completed the 7 week prenatal course at my local hospital (the Royal Prince Alfred Women's and Babies Unit) and she had some interesting feedback on the way that course had been conducted. The educator had managed to alienate the fathers on the first week by making flippant comments such as "you guys won't be doing much - you'll just be there to observe", which angered this father, as he has every intention of being very much involved. Several couples did not return for the rest of the classes and I wondered if the educator followed up to find out why - perhaps her pitch was unappealing? The main thrust of the course, according to my friends, was to prepare the parents for the hospital policies that will be applied to them when they come in during labour. It was stated that "you will have a 30 minute CTG trace done" and when they challenged the necessity of this, it was grudgingly acknowledged that this could be circumvented or done by hand using a sonicaid, but it was emphasised that "this was hospital policy". Other issues such as routine Vitamin K injection for the baby and routine oxytocics for third stage management were also stated as necessary policies. The whole tenor of the discussion (lecture?) was to set parents up for the procedures that would be applied to them. There was no real exploration of the issues nor information given that would enable parents to make an informed choice. If this couple had not continually asked questions and challenged the sweeping statements, the other participants would have had no idea there were other ways the birth could be managed. Having spent a whole week listening te Mavis Kirkham during the Future Birth tour talking about "the rhetoric of choice and the reality of coercion" it was obvious that this was the practice here in Sydney, as it is in most parts of the western world. My friends could certainly relate to this statement when they recalled the program they had just attended. Needless to say, they have sought broader information elsewhere and have crafted a careful birth plan which they will be presenting to their private obstetrician and the midwives in the Birth Centre when the time comes. I have assured them that the Birth Centre midwives will listen carefully to their desires and not perform any routine procedures ( I hope I am right!), and certainly not without clear permission. My neighbours found it ironical that if something is so important that it must be regarded as a necessary routine in the Labour Ward (such as an on-admission CTG trace) that it could be safely overlooked in the Birth Centre. This is indeed another wonderful example of the double standards that exist in maternity care! I am continually amazed that hospital administrators, clinicians and educators fail to grasp the basics of risk management: good communication and full disclosure of all facts so that informed consent can be assured for clinical procedures. When they with hold information (especially deliberately) they leave themselves open legally and it must just be a matter of time before someone takes them on in a court of law, for acting against express wishes that resulted in an unwanted outcome. I say, roll on this day..... perhaps this will be the only way they will learn. Meanwhile, my friends reported that there was one woman in this prenatal program that said not one word through the whole seven weeks, even when invited to speak. Finally, as part of the closing exercise, when each person was asked to give one word about how they were feeling about the program, she volunteered her word - "scarey". A sad indictment of this program and its inability to meet her needs. Posted by andrea at April 24, 2003 07:45 AM Andrea, The doctors coercion was "what influenced the first two ladies and broke their belief in what their body could do" while the teenager doubted the doctor "who was making money by being there"- her comment! Seeing he wasn't she was glad!! Thought I would share this conversation with you. Posted by: Robyn J Aulmann on April 25, 2003 10:45 PM You may find it interesting to visit the sites about poker card, casino no deposit, online casino casions, gambling cash, blackjack sites, roulette casions, gamble tip, internet casino web, slot machine odds, online casino bonus deposit, online gamble game, casino gambling strategies, casino game strategies, las vegas table, video poker casinos, roulette online card, slot rule, blackjack online deposit, blackjack betting 3d, poker 888, gambling 8888, blackjack tip, poker on net, casino casions, casino gaming, gambling no deposit. . Posted by: blackjack on January 19, 2004 09:23 AM You may find it interesting to check the pages in the field of phentermine effect, zyban tablet, viagra cream, propecia for woman, online pharmacy prescriptions, tramadol mens, ultram 400mg, wellbutrin resistance, paxil overnight, meridia comparing, zyrtec online, xenical cheap, vioxx 12 5mg, vaniqa dosage, retin a canada pharmacy, prozac on line, generic viagra 10 pills, celexa woman, buy phentermine addiction, xenical capsules, ambien substitute, dilenyoung about, hopforyou pills, kip980 perscription medication, mng765 what is, pol_uri facts, piter_gordon mail order, miss20092000 2 month supply, robert_zed2003 fasten, fp292003 men, diagodream supplements, jacglen2003 can i, lisa_plamer products, gill_bern review, gtrgtr45 100mg, poklop2000 men`s, nolzer12 men`s, rtopopi mail order pharmacy, oklokol for woman, racertroy2003 information on, viagra information about, phentermine alternative. . Posted by: fp292003 on January 21, 2004 03:09 PM Post a comment |